Critical Alert
IP 62.60.135.165, registered in Iran and operated through AS213456 (Tawsie Technology), is classified as a maximum-threat address based on honeypot sensor detections that captured active hacking behaviour over a concentrated reporting window. With 962 total abuse reports and a threat-level score of 10 out of 10, this address represents a significant intrusion risk for any exposed service.
The intelligence picture presents a notable anomaly: despite 962 cumulative reports, the activity-frequency metric stands at zero, suggesting that the address may have ceased hostile operations or that the reporting window was compressed into a brief burst. Automated honeypot sensors generated all 20 most recent reports, all categorised under general hacking activity encompassing intrusion attempts, vulnerability probing and unauthorized-access vectors. The address was first and last reported within the same month (December 2025), indicating a concentrated but potentially time-limited campaign. With a 59% confidence score, analysts should treat the attribution as plausible but not definitive.
The dominant threat category—general hacking activity—encompasses a broad spectrum of automated and semi-automated intrusion techniques targeting exposed services. Attackers leveraging this address likely conducted reconnaissance sweeps, attempted to exploit known vulnerabilities, or probed authentication mechanisms. The sheer volume of reports suggests a systematic campaign rather than opportunistic noise, meaning exposed and unpatched services face genuine exploitation risk during the active window.
Site operators should treat this address as a high-priority block candidate. Implementing network-level blocking or strict ingress filtering for inbound connections from Iranian address space is advisable where business justification exists. Deploying or configuring defensive tools such as fail2ban to auto-ban repeat offenders on exposed services like SSH, RDP or web application entrypoints will reduce exposure. Systems should be kept current with security patches, and intrusion-detection signatures covering common exploitation patterns provide an additional defensive layer. Continuous monitoring for follow-on activity from adjacent IP ranges is also recommended given the concentrated nature of the reports.
RO 
PH 
UA 
VN