Maximum Danger
IP 206.123.145.75 is a critical-risk address tied to active SSH hacking activity, with 783 abuse reports filed through automated honeypot sensors and a maximum threat score of 10 out of 10, indicating an urgent need for blocking or strict access control on any exposed SSH services.
Recorded activity spans March through April 2026, with all 783 reports sourced exclusively from automated honeypot detections operating on standard SSH ports. The IP originates from AS60223, operated by Netiface Limited in the United States, and carries a 79 percent confidence rating that the observed activity is malicious. The dominant threat category logged against this address is general hacking, specifically unauthorized access attempts targeting SSH infrastructure, as confirmed by a Suricata signature alert flagging an SSH session in progress on an expected port. Despite a reported activity frequency of zero out of ten in the most recent measurement window, the substantial report volume accumulated over a two-month period underscores persistent reconnaissance and authentication brute-forcing behavior.
SSH brute-force and session establishment attempts represent one of the most common initial-access vectors in real-world intrusions, allowing threat actors to silently compromise servers, deploy persistence mechanisms, and pivot laterally into internal networks. The volume of reports against IP 206.123.145.75 suggests an automated, high-throughput campaign likely operating from a botnet or compromised infrastructure, systematically scanning and credential-guessing across exposed hosts. While activity frequency metrics may indicate reduced recent targeting, the historical report density signals that this address has repeatedly demonstrated hostile intent toward SSH endpoints and should not be trusted under any circumstances.
Site operators running publicly accessible SSH services should immediately block IP 206.123.145.75 at the network perimeter firewall or web application firewall level, and consider implementing automatic blocking via tools such as fail2ban or crowdsecurity to handle similar scanning patterns at scale. Enforcing key-based authentication exclusively, disabling password authentication outright, and applying strong passphrase policies will eliminate the primary attack surface that this address is probing. Additionally, implementing rate-limiting on SSH connection attempts, enabling two-factor authentication, and monitoring authentication logs for matching source IPs will reduce exposure to credential-stuffing campaigns broadly. Regular review of honeypot-derived threat-intelligence feeds can further inform blocking rules and network defense posture against recurring SSH scanning infrastructure.
NL 
GB