Significant Threat
IP 45.142.193.233 is a Romanian address operated by Skynet Network Ltd that presents a significant threat to exposed network infrastructure, accumulating 1503 total abuse reports logged by automated honeypot sensors between February and April 2026 and indicating persistent reconnaissance and intrusion activity across a three-month observation window.
The IP demonstrates a clear pattern of hostile network probing, with port scanning accounting for 19 recent reports and general hacking attempts contributing 20 additional reports across 20 distinct automated honeypot sensors. The volume of reports combined with an 8/10 threat level and 75% confidence score establishes this as a reliable indicator of genuine malicious infrastructure. Detection signatures specifically reference Cisco ASA port scan activity, suggesting focused targeting of perimeter security appliances. Romanian network hosting through Skynet Network Ltd aligns with common patterns observed in scanning operations, whether originating from deliberately hosted attack infrastructure or compromised systems within that network.
Port scanning represents the dominant threat category for IP 45.142.193.233, involving systematic enumeration of open services and potential entry points as a precursor to targeted exploitation. The Cisco ASA-specific signatures indicate that this scanning activity is not generic but oriented toward security appliance reconnaissance, potentially identifying vulnerabilities in firewall or VPN infrastructure. While the activity frequency metric shows low real-time engagement, the cumulative report volume demonstrates sustained interest in probing target networks over an extended period, increasing the probability that any exposed service would eventually be evaluated for compromise.
Network defenders should implement firewall deny rules for this address and the broader Skynet Network Ltd allocation, monitor authentication logs for scanning patterns, and deploy rate-limiting on exposed services such as SSH, RDP and VPN portals. Implementing intrusion detection signatures for port scan patterns and using defensive tools such as fail2ban to dynamically block repeated probe attempts will significantly reduce exposure. Organizations should also minimize publicly exposed services and ensure perimeter security appliances run current firmware to withstand the reconnaissance techniques observed from this source.
IR 
KR 
UA 
MX 
UG 
FR 
CA