Maximum Danger
IP 91.92.240.241, allocated to Railnet LLC under autonomous system AS214943 in Germany, presents a maximum threat level of 10/10 based on 1033 total abuse reports submitted between November 2025 and February 2026, with 20 of the most recent reports categorizing the activity as general hacking/intrusion attempts detected exclusively through automated honeypot sensors.
The volume of reports accumulated over approximately three months translates to an average of more than 300 incident submissions per month, yet the current activity frequency registers at 0/10, suggesting a notable decline in recent offensive operations — a pattern sometimes observed when threat actors temporarily reduce visible activity following sustained detection. The 63% confidence score indicates moderate evidentiary certainty, consistent with honeypot-derived attribution that identifies malicious behavior without revealing the ultimate objective of the intrusion campaign. All 20 most recent reports originated from automated honeypot infrastructure, meaning this address has been systematically probing sensor environments designed to mimic vulnerable services, providing reliable evidence of hostile intent independent of voluntary community submissions.
General hacking activity encompasses a broad spectrum of unauthorized access attempts, including exploitation of known software vulnerabilities, credential guessing, and reconnaissance against exposed network endpoints. Even without pinpointing the specific exploit vector, the sheer report volume confirms that operators of this IP have systematically attempted to compromise services at scale. For any organization running SSH, RDP, web applications, or database services exposed to the internet, connection attempts from such a prolific source represent a concrete risk of initial access, lateral movement, or data exfiltration if defenses are not adequately hardened.
Site operators should treat this IP as high-priority for immediate blocking at the network perimeter firewall or via intrusion prevention systems, and consider implementing automated blocking mechanisms such as fail2ban or similar dynamic deny-lists triggered by repeated suspicious connection patterns. Patching exposed services according to vendor timelines, enforcing strong authentication requirements, and enabling detailed connection logging will reduce the practical impact of any future contact from similar threat infrastructure. Ongoing monitoring of related AS214943 address space is advisable given the concentration of malicious activity associated with this network operator.
US 
BG 
SC 
RO