Extreme Threat
IP address 216.126.229.7 is a critical-risk address associated with 856 reported abuse incidents, predominantly categorized as hacking activity targeting exposed services. Hosted within the AS30823 autonomous system operated by aurologic GmbH in Germany, this IP presents a severe threat to any publicly accessible network infrastructure.
Analysis of the available telemetry reveals 856 total abuse reports attributed to this address, with 20 recent reports specifically documenting hacking intrusion attempts detected by automated honeypot sensors. The first and most recent reports both originated in November 2025, indicating concentrated malicious activity during that period. Despite the notably high report volume, the activity frequency metric stands at 0/10, suggesting that while the historical abuse record is substantial, current scanning behavior may have subsided. The 76% confidence score reflects substantial but not definitive attribution, consistent with IPs involved in broad opportunistic scanning campaigns where precise targeting intentions remain partially ambiguous.
The dominant threat category—hacking—encompasses unauthorized access attempts, exploitation of software vulnerabilities, and intrusion activity against exposed services. This pattern indicates that IP 216.126.229.7 has been actively probing external-facing systems for exploitable weaknesses rather than conducting highly targeted operations. The real-world risk includes credential compromise, data exfiltration, and pivoting from compromised services into broader network infrastructure. Organizations running exposed SSH, RDP, web applications, or other network services face the greatest exposure to this type of automated threat actor.
Site operators should take immediate defensive action. Block or restrict traffic from 216.126.229.7 at the network perimeter firewall. Implement fail2ban or similar dynamic firewall rules to automatically block repeated connection attempts targeting authentication interfaces. Enforce strong, unique credentials and consider key-based authentication for remotely accessible services. Maintain comprehensive logging and monitor for any authentication anomalies originating from this address range, even if current activity appears dormant, as threat actors frequently resume operations after quiet periods.